|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Exiled One
|
Posted - 2006.06.15 05:43:00 -
[1]
22 pages of whine and no reply from a dev, no? Well you think it's ******* fun to have 92.5% clean em resistance on minmatar t2 ships and 69-74% with 1 adaptive energized t2 (ONE bloody energized adaptive nano friggin membrane) on any ship with a clean EM resistance of 60%. Good job.
|
Exiled One
|
Posted - 2006.06.15 14:03:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Hey You Edited by: Hey You on 15/06/2006 12:50:56 FFS, explosive crystals would be the wrong way to go. Change the ratio of EM/Thermal to more even, or Thermal being the primary. And boost the baisc damage output on all amarr guns by a touch. Just a little bit.
QFT. That's the ONLY thing that MUST be done. Just change the bloody crystals ! And quafe boys need to **** off from this thread. We know what a bloody megathron or a thorax is capable of, you dont know **** about mallers and apocs.
|
Exiled One
|
Posted - 2006.06.15 16:09:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Exiled One on 15/06/2006 16:10:50
Originally by: madaluap Edited by: madaluap on 15/06/2006 14:49:42
Originally by: Exogene
Originally by: madaluap But well who cares, nobody flies hacs in pvp anyway, last zealots i saw were whoring lvl 4 missions or doing complex.
You really don't know what you are talking about
lol yeh i do, nobody flies hacs in pvp exept:
1. alliance bears 2. rich carebears, but he! they are carebears 3. You i guess?
And i mean flying them, not being ganged up with 35 other hacs slaying tech 1 cruisers, while having a full rack of stabs...
Then you talk from experience, troll.
edit: It's not our bloody problem that you dont have the isk for buy a ******* deimos after the blasters got 'boosted'. So, shoo, go now, troll.
|
Exiled One
|
Posted - 2006.06.15 17:26:00 -
[4]
Originally by: madaluap
Originally by: madaluap Edited by: madaluap on 15/06/2006 10:32:04 What i do/dont support: 1. explosive crystals, c'mon just think it over gamebalance would die. 2. Maller sucks it doesnt have enough dmg!11!, maller is a great pvp ship, it will kill a thorax, the uberdps boat. Tanking is its power. 3. omen needs more grid i have said this again and again omen needs more grid 4. same for arbitrator (onoes mada has actually flown ammar) 5. PG requirments on medium (small) guns need to be downed.
A ship like the omen is a dps ship, but than CCP went the tanking way and gank was a thing of the past.
What i proposed was giving the omen about 70% of the damage of a thorax, but with more optimal. IF the thing can use heavy pulse 2 lasers it should come close to the ion blasters and tech 2 drones of the thorax.
Because the ion thorax doesnt carry a 800mm plate , but the omen does that means you would have some serieus problems on hands as a thorax pilot and not to mention the omen would be better for camping because of instadmg.
Arbitrator only needs a bit more PG, so it can compete with vexor.
I started flying gallente a while ago when ammar was teh pwn, now throug some flavour of the month changes gallente suddenly pwn. Nerf ecm, nerf nos and we'll see what we end up with.
/edit: I really dont care about personal insults, i really dont.
Besides EAM 2 stack ok? What does that mean, thats means that a 25% resistance bonus is actually a hell lot better than fitting a maxed out EAM2.
What is so extreme about this, in what sense is this whining? what sense is this screaming?
I have only seen people quote my first line about that i dislike explosive damage, because that just aint ammar. What i get is 25 angry ammarian fanboys up my neck. Just read the goddamn text and tell what you AGREE on? ok?
and again: I dont care about personal insults, i really dont. So stop using them.
Ok, boy you don't fly amarr, you dont care about amarr ships, nor lasers. Go ahead and man your vexor ! Now, when next time you train something and waste 6 bloody months specializing dont come crying, K?
|
Exiled One
|
Posted - 2006.06.16 16:24:00 -
[5]
Originally by: twit brent my tach geddon will blow up any ship faster than a railtron can by a long way unless that ship is set for just EM + thermal tanking.
so you like useeingngn rails and 1400mm howwiez for close range do you ?!@??!? yes???
|
Exiled One
|
Posted - 2006.06.20 03:08:00 -
[6]
Yay boost gallente, boost minmatar, leave ecm as it is for caldari and of course boost china, we don't give a **** about amarr!
|
Exiled One
Amarr
|
Posted - 2006.07.27 14:06:00 -
[7]
AMARR tier 3 bs --- http://www.eve-online.com/itemdatabase/ships/cruisers/amarr/628.asp
|
Exiled One
Amarr
|
Posted - 2006.07.27 14:20:00 -
[8]
Originally by: south24
Originally by: Zhon That interesting tux responds to a thread to correct someone spelling but for some reason wonĘt respond to a 45 page post that everyone wants him to respond to.
Real Nice.....
my thoughts exactly.... usually leave this thread to last on my forum trips to see if devs have been about
but to be honest i really don't think we will get a response... not in this thread anyway, but just A response would be nice, just one, just let me know I should train gallente and get it over with
That was my thread
reasons for no reply:
1. china 2. they don't really care
what happened to the lub fest of ppl asking and receiving that we had back in the 2004
|
Exiled One
Amarr
|
Posted - 2006.07.27 14:31:00 -
[9]
Originally by: south24
Originally by: Exiled One
That was my thread
like that's something to be proud of
No, hence the - - smilie in the end. But i guess and i really HOPE that ccp is REVIEWING the whole tier 3 bs situation and the stats( bonuses ) WILL be based on TIER 3/2 CRUISERS
arbitrator > abaddon moa > rokh (already) bellicose > maelstrom celestis > hyperion.
|
Exiled One
Amarr
|
Posted - 2006.07.27 14:46:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Dixon
Originally by: Exiled One
Originally by: south24
Originally by: Exiled One
That was my thread
like that's something to be proud of
No, hence the - - smilie in the end. But i guess and i really HOPE that ccp is REVIEWING the whole tier 3 bs situation and the stats( bonuses ) WILL be based on TIER 3/2 CRUISERS
arbitrator > abaddon moa > rokh (already) bellicose > maelstrom celestis > hyperion.
That is the worst idea I've ever seen... let us have the gankaddon!!
This is eve, that part of eve that is gone, that you did not experience and probably will never do, unless you move to china.
|
|
Exiled One
Amarr Imperial Shipment
|
Posted - 2006.10.21 18:22:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Shugo Kazuma
Originally by: Gagarish p.s. I really feel sorry for CPP when it allowes people who are positioned as "developers" to admit that they aren't capable of understanding the problem.
I still don't understand why one person does game balance. You'd think at least 2 people who be doing balancing, having 2 races each under their supervision. That way they can bounce ideas off each other and not come up with these "small" changes I see stickied to the top of the forum (if these are small changes, I cannot wait to see what the "big" changes are going to look like).
QFT.
Bump for great justice
|
|
|
|